The best way to fix your PC to run at peak performance is to update your drivers. Below is a list of our most popular ASUS support software and device drivers. First select the Model Name or Number of your device. Next click the Download button. If you do not find the right match, type the model in the search box below to.

You may see different versions. Choose the best match for your PC. Need more help? Discuss driver problems and ask for help from our community on our. Or you can and we will find it for you. We employ a team from around the world.

How to Download ASUS X555LN Drivers. Size: Less than 1 MB Download Time: Under 1 minute. Device Name: ASUS X555LN Drivers; Category: ASUS >Notebooks >X555LN; Version: 9.02; Os: Windows 8.1 64-bit; Download: ASUS X555LN nVidia Graphics Driver. Device Name: ASUS X555LN Drivers.

They add hundreds of new drivers to our site every day.

The UX3430UQ offers the high case quality we came to expect from Zenbooks. All parts match perfectly and there are no gaps or crevices. The base does not flex or twist unless torsional forces are enormous, and even then it only does so minimally and does not creak at all. The display lid is not as warp-resistant as the base, but it is highly pressure-resistant. It cannot be opened one-handed, and teetering is limited to a minimum. All things considered, the solid and very rigid case matches the device’s high price and left a pretty good overall impression. Connectivity is not particularly outstanding, and the Zenbook lacks both Thunderbolt 3 and a dedicated DisplayPort.

What it does have to offer are 1x USB 2.0 (Type-A), 1x USB 3.0 (Type-A), and 1x USB 3.1 Gen. The latter also carries a DisplayPort signal and can be used for external displays. An adapter to HDMI for use with the microHDMI port is also included. All ports are distributed more or less evenly along both sides and are placed towards the rear of the device. The USB 2.0 port on the right side is most likely going to be used for an external mouse so adding another USB 3.0 port here would have been rather moot. While the Zenbook lacks a dedicated Ethernet port, Asus does include a USB Type-A to Ethernet (RJ45) adapter in the box.

Based on the SD-card reader’s pretty poor performance when tested with our Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II reference card, we suspect that it is only connected via USB 2.0 instead of the much faster 3.0, just like on the other Zenbook. At the Zenbook’s price point, we would have expected more. The Dell’s card reader seems to be connected via PCIe; however, the discrepancy between the sequential read speeds and the real-world JPEG copy test is striking. Here, the XPS performs about as fast as the Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus and is therefore only about as fast as any other USB 3.0 card reader.

ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM). This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected In comparison: 54% of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8546 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. The CPU, an (2x 2.7 – 3.5 GHz, Hyper-Threading, 15 W TDP), is one of the fastest CPUs from Intel’s current Kaby Lake line-up. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and a slightly higher clock rate, the i7-7500U is around 15% faster than its direct predecessor, the i7-6500U (2x 2.5 – 3.1 GHz). Considering the circumstances, this is a substantial performance gain. In multi-core load scenarios, the CPU is limited by its TDP. Maximum turbo boost on two cores is up to 3.5 GHz but can’t be upheld for long.

Overall, the CPU performed as expected. The fastest i7-7500U we found in our database was around 9% faster, and the average Cinebench R15 score for this particular CPU was around 3% lower than on the UX3430UQ. In the Cinebench multi-core loop, the CPU reduced its maximum turbo boost during the second iteration already. The CPU was unable to utilize its full turbo potential for prolonged periods of time, but it fared better than the same CPU in the recently reviewed. Thus, the additional benefits when compared to the (2x 2.5 – 3.1 GHz) are quite obvious.

The results are identical on battery. In the case of the UX3430UQ, the GPU is equipped with 2 GB of DDR3 RAM (the slower of the two options) and is only a mere 30% faster than the integrated GPU. Sure, in some games this can make a huge difference, but of all 940MX laptops ever reviewed by us, the UX3430UQ is in second to last place and the UX3410UQ in last place in 3DMark 11. The difference between our review model and the fastest 940MX in our review database is a whopping 44%! Fire Strike (2013) showed similar results. Running 3DMark 11 on battery yielded the same results.

The CPU clock speed dropped to between 2.4 and 2.6 GHz when running Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously. Given its base clock speed of 2.7 GHz we must thus deduce that the CPU does throttle somewhat under heavy load. CPU temperature never exceeded 82 °C, though.

The GPU throttled even worse, and after a few minutes of extreme load clock speeds dropped from the 940MX’s initial 900 MHz to between 405 and 800 MHz, alternating quickly back and forth. With GPU-Z, we were able to determine the cause for this behavior: apparently, the GPU’s thermal limit is set to 77 °C. In all fairness we must add that real-world gaming load fluctuates more and thus varies greatly from the synthetic maximum GPU load caused by FurMark.

Thus, GPU-throttling while running games should not be as problematic as it was during our stress test. Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T audio analysis (±) speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median (±) linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. Frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median (+) mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev.

Frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median (+) highs are linear (5% delta to prev. Frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse » The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47% Compared to all devices tested » 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%. Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis (±) speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median (±) linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. Frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (±) higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median (±) linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev.

Frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median (+) highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. Frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median) Compared to same class » 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse » The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47% Compared to all devices tested » 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%.

Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis (±) speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (±) reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median (+) bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. Frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (±) higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median (+) mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. Frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median (+) highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev.

Frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median) Compared to same class » 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse » The best had a delta of 9%, average was 20%, worst was 47% Compared to all devices tested » 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%. Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis (+) speakers can play relatively loud (86.97 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median (±) linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev.

Frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median (±) linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. Frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median (±) linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev.

Frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (+) overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median) Compared to same class » 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 67% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35% Compared to all devices tested » 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse » The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%. Certainly so. I Am Tpain App Free Download Ipod Touch. The Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ is much more of a business and office companion, and it won’t stand in the way of non-professional photo-editing aspirations. Lightlid 35 Calibrator Download Adobe. Thanks to its thin bezels, the well-made 14-inch case is fairly compact. Very long battery life and the security features included in the notebook make it very portable. If not for the rather loud large keys on the keyboard, the device would have been very silent overall. All things considered, the input devices should please most prolific writers.